Not signed in (Sign In)

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

  1.  
    WHY ARE YOU SO DUMB EPA

    I could be wrong, this could be a brilliant political move to erase the prevalent arguments of the coal lobby entrenched within the halls of government! Surely the comments will be overwhelmingly toward the more expensive option, especially with no giant interests paying smaller lobbying organizations to field mass potemkin write-ins. That's never been a common technique used all of the time, right?

    Cynically speaking, the entire seeking-comment to produce a paper to advise a committee to allow the managers to deliberate so on and so forth is a traditional stall tactic to prevent legislation or changes from being implemented or even considered in the near future. Though the EPA can essentially appoint themselves powers at any time they are either doing this (it seems to me) on orders from the West Wing to allow further time for obamoperatives maneuvering or to provide themselves with validation for their self-appointments, because they believe that validation is going to make a difference justification-wise to the partisan Supreme Court, where a ruling would eventually be headed if Congress (when Congress) gets involved. The assumption that Congress wouldn't get involved if they receive lots of comment stems from a misunderstanding of how Congress is funded through campaigns, especially now that corporations have free reign to exercise their "freedom of speech".
  2.  
    These three paragraphs are worth reading
  3.  


    TIM: I warned you! But did you listen to me? Oh, no, you knew it all,
    didn't you? Oh, it's just a harmless little bunny, isn't it? Well,
    it's always the same, I always--
    ARTHUR: Oh, shut up!
  4.  
    Behavioral Economic environmental reactivity split across the socio-political boundary

    In recent research, we present evidence that behavioural economists have underestimated the role that ideological heterogeneity plays in determining the effectiveness of energy conservation nudges.

    We find that the effectiveness of energy conservation nudges depend on an individual’s political views. Although liberals and environmentalists are more energy efficient than conservatives (Costa and Kahn 2010b) – thus making it harder for them to reduce consumption further – we find that liberals and environmentalists are more responsive to these nudges than the average person. In contrast, for certain subsets of Republican registered voters, we find that the specific “treatment nudge” that we evaluate has the unintended consequence of increasing electricity consumption.

    The 'nudge' in this case is comparisons with average use. Conservatives purposely use more energy after being informed of their relative consumption level. Maybe... it's because they feel such loyalty to the power company for providing this information that they want to reward the executives? :sad:
  5.  
    Stop Drilling Petition

    I can't find the original petition text anywhere so hopefully this is not a corporate trick

    Not that all corporate tricks are bad- Shazam!
  6.  
    Bike Parking in Philadelphia

    ןooɔ sı sıɥʇ `sıɥʇ ǝʞıן ı
  7.  
  8.  
    In the 600 page BP Emergency Plan "in case anything ever happens" Primary Equipment Provider status has been assigned to a strange Japanese site advertising Square Enix and sushi blenders

    I'm a bit afraid Janis will come on and write "This is the Japanese Department of the Interior Searchbar" or somesuch craziness
  9.  
    FINALLY

    The fact that 47 U.S. senators would vote against this bill kind of makes me want to drink bleach and burn my eyebrows off with a blowtorch
  10.  


    Why is the sun shrinking?


    Our "luck" missing sunspots during the reversal of Earth's magnetic poles may instead be a solar storm period making the near future some of the worst decades to be alive in human history... not counting the eighties of course. :P
  11.  
    •  
      CommentAuthordchamp
    • CommentTimeJun 20th 2010
     
    ^^^
    DO NOT WANT!
    •  
      CommentAuthorSammyD
    • CommentTimeJun 20th 2010
     
    I don't understand how it can remain cool... And I wouldn't want gel over my food.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSillyYak
    • CommentTimeJun 20th 2010
     
    whoa. that's weird. i also don't understand how it cools stuff. could it be used as a freezer too? and once you take a food product out does the gel fill in the hole where it used to be or does it just become holey-gelly?

    WEIRD
  12.  
    we cool things to slow bacterial growth in our food, the goo instead uses bioluminescence to disaffect any bacteria in it's vicinity so that it doesn't require cooling- and what if the goo is freaking delicious?

    Naturally it won't keep icecream or pudding cool but it might regrow itself slowly as some bio-polymers have demonstrated the ability to do, it would likely eat ambient toxins for fuel. I doubt it would be difficult to wash off the stuff if necessary. If it ever gets to market I'll have you all over to try it out, I promise :wink:
    •  
      CommentAuthordchamp
    • CommentTimeJun 20th 2010
     
    Tastes like chicken.
  13.  
    Cost projections for staple food crops with global warming effect in fifty years

    increased demand, diminished supply
  14.  
  15.  
    naturally there needs to be a study on the effects of the chemicals leaching from the polypropylene bags as they are exposed to bleach, hot water, and soap though... that may be even worse cancer-wise
  16.  
    It's finally X-prize time!

    No mainstream media coverage it seems :confused:
  17.  
  18.  
    Google Energy, a subsidiary of Google that was created to give the company the ability to buy power on the wholesale market, has just inked a 20-year deal to buy 114 megawatts of power from the NextEra Energy Resources Story County II wind farm in Iowa. This is just one of many approaches that Google takes to try to become a carbon-neutral company. Read on for more details.


    Do all wind farms have such terrible names? Let's call it Douglas, or Windraker Field, or The Gates of Aeolus
  19.  
  20.  
    AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!

    Very disturbing? We can't with our current technology stop the warming cycle where it is, or the oceanic effects associated, so It is going to be interesting to see how many of them are actually going to survive, which is what the MIT climate model was saying as well!



    Cum dederit dilectis suis somnum
    •  
      CommentAuthorHollisb
    • CommentTimeAug 2nd 2010
     
    Thanks Will for ruining my day ;) Really though, reading that article with that haunting Vivaldi in the background and seeing the grim reaper pic is, well, sad.
  21.  
    Sad indeed, the world is mad. I forwarded the link to Whitehouse.gov and was sent the usual form letter in reply. Anyone want to TP this?
  22.  
    Kill all mosquitoes?

    "They don't occupy an unassailable niche in the environment," says entomologist Joe Conlon, of the American Mosquito Control Association in Jacksonville, Florida. "If we eradicated them tomorrow, the ecosystems where they are active will hiccup and then get on with life. Something better or worse would take over."
    •  
      CommentAuthorTheSasquatch
    • CommentTimeAug 13th 2010 edited
     
    China is beating us as though we have insulted their mother



    Recently reading an article on how there is no point in the existence of Belgium there was a discussion mentioned on a blog discussing it about how the EU was cleverly created by it's founders by turning the tribalism and suspicion each nation had for it's neighbors outward to the rest of the world, to form a single European identity. Similarly with this commentery we could harness the American people's xenophobia toward climate development!
    • CommentAuthorvonahsen
    • CommentTimeAug 13th 2010
     
    stupid sexy flanders

  23.